![]() ![]() When setting up the print preferences for the driver on the server you would set it to always prompt for a pin code. If private print is set on the server's install of the print driver, a user would not be able to print without providing a pin code that they set on their downloaded print driver. This would also involve how the IT dept is setting up the laptops, is it on an individual basis or through group policy? Setting up the laptops individually allows them to determine who can install drivers and who can not, group policy would be all or none unless they had created special user groups and assigned the individual users to a specific group, ie allowed or not allowed. Is it possible to enforce private print code on the printer, so that users can't print without it? If I follow your suggestion users will be able to print without private code.Blocking print driver install through active directory does not necessarily mean a laptop user can not install a home printer, the blocking occurs while they are connected to the corporate network and trying to install a driver for a network connected printer. But blocking print driver installation will prevent notebook users from installing home printers. The "guest user" I'm refering to is "guest authorization" on the local authentication setup.ĭriver is distributed on a Windows server 2012, but the private printing is configured in each computer, as each user has is own password. No, it is an AD user with Zimbra email account. As a second thought, if your customer is trying to prevent "unauthorized" users from printing, why is the driver loaded on the user's machine in the first place? How does your customer's IT dept. If the driver is on a server it is a one shot deal, if the driver are on individual computers you will have to set that up on each computer and enter the code that is to be used. ![]() It is the print driver that controls private print, is the driver setup on a server or individual computers? Based on what you have revealed so far, I would turn off the local authorization so the generic scan to email will use the SMTP server information you setup, and set the print driver to require a private print code. I'm using "guest user" so that users doesn't have to log on the printer just to scan or copy.Do you have a "guest user" account setup on the SMTP server? Just because it is a "guest' account it still uses the SMTP server and STILL requires to be authenticated! Private Print has Nothing to do with SMTP. We have to use private printing to comply to internal policy. I'm using authentication just to block users from unauthorized printing without the private printing password. But with "guest user" should it not use SMTP user? Is it possible to set the email user for the guest user?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |